[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15348205#comment-15348205
]
Vladimir Ozerov edited comment on IGNITE-3328 at 6/24/16 12:44 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Pavel,
My comments:
1) I would hide {{AffintiyFunctionBase}} in internal namespace. Otherwise
potential implementors will try using it.
2) I do not see why do we need {{IAffinityFunctionContext}}. This is our
internal thing, and user will never implement it in his own.
3) Coding quidelines are not respected in Java. Missing empty lines between
semantically different lines, incorrect { placement (.Net style instead of Java
style).
Vladimir.
was (Author: vozerov):
Pavel,
My comments:
1) I would hide {{AffintiyFunctionBase}} in internal namespace. Otherwise
potential implementors will try using it.
2) I do not see why do we need {{IAffinityFunctionContext}}. This is just some
3) Coding quidelines are not respected in Java. Missing empty lines between
semantically different lines, incorrect { placement (.Net style instead of Java
style).
Vladimir.
> .NET: Support user-defined AffinityFunction
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-3328
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3328
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: platforms
> Affects Versions: 1.6
> Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: .net
> Fix For: 1.7
>
>
> Allow custom AffinityFunction implementation in .NET
> Make sure it can be set in XML config.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)