[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17808840#comment-17808840
]
Scott Feldstein commented on IGNITE-8801:
-----------------------------------------
hi, i understand this question is really late in the game but could someone
explain why this was ultimately merged when the last two comments in the [dev
thread|https://lists.apache.org/thread/3wxpx2tw9xnn74139nkqopdom5mh6q74]
correctly point out that there are valid use-cases for atomic and transactional
caches to be commingled? Was there some other conversation that occurred
around this?
> Change default behaviour of atomic operations inside transactions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-8801
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8801
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Ryabov Dmitrii
> Assignee: Julia Bakulina
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: ise
> Fix For: 2.15
>
> Time Spent: 5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Need to change default behaviour of atomic operations to fail inside
> transactions.
> 1) Remove IGNITE_ALLOW_ATOMIC_OPS_IN_TX system property.
> 2) Set default value to restrict atomic operations in
> {{CacheOperationContext}} constructor without arguments and arguments for
> calls of another constructor.
> 3) Fix javadocs.
> As per the latest round of discussion on Ignite Dev List as of 28/10/2022 we
> agreed on the following:
> 1) Revert deprecation IGNITE-17916 - reverted
> 2) Change default value in 2.15.
> 3) Notify users in release notes, an exception message - how to change the
> behavior back.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
