[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-21379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Lapin updated IGNITE-21379:
-------------------------------------
Description:
h3. Motivation
Seems that our busyLocks (IgniteSpinBusyLock) aren't good enough from the
performance perspective. Let's compare current implementation with common RW
locks, CheckpointReadWriteLock, etc. Depending on the results it'll be required
either to use faster implementation or re-consider busyLock idea itself because
currently it brings significant performance drop. Given ticket is only about
initial step - busyLock performance investigation.
> Investigate whether currently used busyLocks implementation is fast enough.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-21379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-21379
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Alexander Lapin
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ignite-3, performance
>
> h3. Motivation
> Seems that our busyLocks (IgniteSpinBusyLock) aren't good enough from the
> performance perspective. Let's compare current implementation with common RW
> locks, CheckpointReadWriteLock, etc. Depending on the results it'll be
> required either to use faster implementation or re-consider busyLock idea
> itself because currently it brings significant performance drop. Given ticket
> is only about initial step - busyLock performance investigation.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
