[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-22583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kirill Tkalenko updated IGNITE-22583:
-------------------------------------
Description:
Get rid of {{{}byte[]{}}} in messages. It's used in classes like
{{{}org.apache.ignite.internal.metastorage.dsl.Operation{}}}. If we migrate
these properties to {{ByteBuffer}} then deserialization will become
significantly faster, but in order to utilize it we would have to change
internal metastorage implementation a little bit (like optimizing memory usage
in {{{}RocksDbKeyValueStorage#addDataToBatch{}}}).
If it requires too many changes then I propose doing it in a separate JIRA. My
assumption - it will not require too many changes, but we'll see.
was:
Pretty much the same thing, but for {{{}byte[]{}}}. It's used in classes like
{{{}org.apache.ignite.internal.metastorage.dsl.Operation{}}}. If we migrate
these properties to {{ByteBuffer}} then deserialization will become
significantly faster, but in order to utilize it we would have to change
internal metastorage implementation a little bit (like optimizing memory usage
in {{{}RocksDbKeyValueStorage#addDataToBatch{}}}).
If it requires too many changes then I propose doing it in a separate JIRA. My
assumption - it will not require too many changes, but we'll see.
> Get rid of byte[] in messages
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-22583
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-22583
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Kirill Tkalenko
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ignite-3, ignite3_performance
> Fix For: 3.0.0-beta2
>
>
> Get rid of {{{}byte[]{}}} in messages. It's used in classes like
> {{{}org.apache.ignite.internal.metastorage.dsl.Operation{}}}. If we migrate
> these properties to {{ByteBuffer}} then deserialization will become
> significantly faster, but in order to utilize it we would have to change
> internal metastorage implementation a little bit (like optimizing memory
> usage in {{{}RocksDbKeyValueStorage#addDataToBatch{}}}).
> If it requires too many changes then I propose doing it in a separate JIRA.
> My assumption - it will not require too many changes, but we'll see.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
