[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-22914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roman Puchkovskiy updated IGNITE-22914:
---------------------------------------
Description:
Currently, for each Metastorage revision, we store the revision number and its
timestamp. We should add the third element a checksum.
Having the checksums will allow us to make sure that Metastorage does not
diverge.
The checksum is to be calculated from the Metastorage command generating the
revision (it is enough to include in the checksum the changes the command
applies to the Metastorage AND the result it returns to the caller), and it
should also contain the previous checksum, so the checksums will form a chain.
First revision would use a zero checksum as the 'previous revision checksum'.
When Metastorage is compacted up to revision N, checksums up to revision N are
to be removed.
was:
Currently, for each Metastorage revision, we store the revision number and its
timestamp. We should add the third element a checksum.
The checksum is to be calculated from the Metastorage command generating the
revision (it is enough to include in the checksum the changes the command
applies to the Metastorage AND the result it returns to the caller), and it
should also contain the previous checksum, so the checksums will form a chain.
First revision would use a zero checksum as the 'previous revision checksum'.
When Metastorage is compacted up to revision N, checksums up to revision N are
to be removed.
> Store a checksum with each Metastorage revision
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-22914
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-22914
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Roman Puchkovskiy
> Assignee: Roman Puchkovskiy
> Priority: Major
> Labels: iep-128, ignite-3
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently, for each Metastorage revision, we store the revision number and
> its timestamp. We should add the third element a checksum.
> Having the checksums will allow us to make sure that Metastorage does not
> diverge.
> The checksum is to be calculated from the Metastorage command generating the
> revision (it is enough to include in the checksum the changes the command
> applies to the Metastorage AND the result it returns to the caller), and it
> should also contain the previous checksum, so the checksums will form a
> chain. First revision would use a zero checksum as the 'previous revision
> checksum'.
> When Metastorage is compacted up to revision N, checksums up to revision N
> are to be removed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
