[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kirill Tkalenko updated IGNITE-23504:
-------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 3.0

> Add configuration of local and distributed system properties
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-23504
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23504
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Kirill Tkalenko
>            Assignee: Kirill Tkalenko
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> At the moment we do not have a single mechanism for working with system 
> properties, both local and distributed.
> Since we have a configuration and tools for working with it (for example, 
> cli), it is proposed to use it to work with system properties. The user will 
> be able to change some property value if he needs to, otherwise the default 
> value will be used, which will be set in the code.
> For the user it will look something like this (via cli):
> {noformat}
> [defaultNode]> node config show ignite.system.properties
> igniteFirstProperties {
>     propertyValue=100
> }
> igniteSecondProperties {
>     propertyValue=lru
> }
> [defaultNode]> node config show ignite.system.properties.igniteFirstProperties
> propertyValue=100
> [defaultNode]> cluster config show ignite.system.properties
> igniteFirstProperties {
>     propertyValue=100
> }
> igniteSecondProperties {
>     propertyValue=lru
> }
> [defaultNode]> cluster config show 
> ignite.system.properties.igniteFirstProperties
> propertyValue=100
> {noformat}
> The changes are the same as when working with named lists.
> Technically, this will be implemented through configuration schemes, 
> something like this:
> {noformat}
> @Config
> public class SystemDistributedConfigurationSchema {
>     @NamedConfigValue
>     public SystemPropertyConfigurationSchema properties;
> }
> @Config
> public class SystemPropertyConfigurationSchema {
>     @InjectedName
>     public String name;
>     @Value
>     public String propertyValue;
> }
> @Config
> public class SystemLocalConfigurationSchema {
>     ...
>       
>     @NamedConfigValue
>     public SystemPropertyConfigurationSchema properties;
> }
> {noformat}
> For consistency, the naming of properties will use camelCase as for 
> configuration fields and the corresponding validator will be added.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to