[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-22490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17906374#comment-17906374
]
Roman Puchkovskiy commented on IGNITE-22490:
--------------------------------------------
This setting is used not just in Raft-related code, but also in primary
replica-related code, so replication.{*}raft{*}.batchSizeBytes doesn't seem to
be optimal. Should it be replication.batchSizeBytes?
> Move storageUpdate.batchByteLength config value to
> replication.raft.batchSizeBytes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-22490
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-22490
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: configuration
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-beta1
> Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ignite-3
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Move *storageUpdate.batchByteLength* config value to
> *replication.raft.batchSizeBytes*
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
