[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-24107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17914740#comment-17914740
 ] 

Pavel Pereslegin edited comment on IGNITE-24107 at 1/20/25 5:23 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Our use case benchmarks did not show any noticeable improvements in memory 
allocation/performance, so we decided to leave BinaryTupleBuilder with internal 
byte buffer allocation for now.


was (Author: xtern):
Our use case benchs did not show any noticeable improvements in memory 
allocation/performance, so we decided to leave BinaryTupleBuilder with internal 
byte buffer allocation for now.

> Allow to use an existing buffer in BinaryTupleBuilder
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-24107
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-24107
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Maksim Zhuravkov
>            Assignee: Pavel Pereslegin
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Sometimes we want to write a tuple into an existing buffer but 
> BinaryTupleBuilder always allocates a new buffer for each binary tuple it 
> builds. Let's update BinaryTupleBuilder to accept a component that allocates 
> a buffer used by BinaryTupleBuilder. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to