[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15420646#comment-15420646
]
Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-3639:
-----------------------------------------
Taras,
I removed buffer size properties form public API at the moment. This way we can
release first version without waiting for this ticket to complete. And
irrespective of your findings we will not break backward compatibility or
compilation in further versions.
Let's restore buffer size getter/setter if you find that buffering makes sense.
> IGFS: Local secondary: investigate whether we need BufferedOutputStream for
> create/append.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-3639
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3639
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: IGFS
> Affects Versions: 1.6
> Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
> Assignee: Taras Ledkov
> Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> We already have a buffer inside {{IgfsOutputStreamImpl}}. Do we really need
> to wrap {{FileOutputStream}} into another buffer?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
