[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17987255#comment-17987255
 ] 

Maksim Timonin commented on IGNITE-23120:
-----------------------------------------

Hi [~phillippko]

 

>> Then will add this check to InlineRecommender.recommend, not on tree creation

Yes, I propose to add additional check to InlineRecommender. If inlineSize > 
threshold then WARN. 

But you need check it, I'm not sure that the place we invoke the recommender 
now is in a right place for a described scenario. If you find that this is not 
a very good idea, then OK. Let's write somewhere else.

>> Should it be done only once, or every X (1000) invocations as with another 
>> check

I'd make it regular (every X times), to highlight importance of that.

>> There is a way to disable a warn?

Actually, I thought that there is a way to disable the recommender. But it's 
not. Not a problem I think.

>> How to choose reasonable percentage?)) Could we set a large limit (i.e. 20%) 
>> and leave it to users to perftest further?
 
We can set up it to 40% (~ you calculated it above), if there is no other 
calculations or ideas. Later we can make it more restrictive if needed.
 

 

 

 

> Improve inline index feature
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-23120
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-23120
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Vladimir Pligin
>            Assignee: Philipp Shergalis
>            Priority: Major
>
> Ignite allows index rows to be inlined directly into the page. However, it 
> doesn’t guard properly against too big inline size values. Currently, it uses 
> {{PageIO.MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE}} as the maximum allowed value, but this value can 
> still be too large, because it does not take the page size and encryption 
> (which adds additional bytes to the page header) into account. This possibly 
> leads to a bad situation when only one item can fit in one page which can 
> lead to BTree performance degradation.
> The following is expected to be done:
>  # When inline size for an index is set, a maximum inline size should be 
> computed:
>  ## Considering we want to have _at least_ 2 items per page, here’s how the 
> page layout with max inline size will look like: {{PS = H + L + I + L + I + 
> L}} . Where PS - Page Size, H - page header size, L - size of the child link, 
> I - item size.
>  ## Using the above equation, we get the max possible item size to be equal 
> to: {{I = (PS - H - 3L) / 2}} . However, for inline indexes, every item has 
> an additional overhead to the actual inlined value (a.k.a payload), which 
> depends on MVCC being present.
>  ## Taking this into account, the maximum payload size will be equal: {{P = 
> (PS - H - 3L) / 2 - X}} , where P - Payload size, X - overhead per item.
>  ## In implementation terms, {{PS}} must be computed using the 
> {{PageMemory#realPageSize}} which takes encryption overhead into 
> account,{{{}H{}}} is equal to {{{}BPlusIo#ITEMS_OFF{}}}, {{L}} is 8 bytes and 
> {{X}} depends on the actual {{AbstractH2ExtrasInnerIO}} implementation and 
> varies between 8 and 28 bytes.
>  # If the configured inline size exceeds the computed maximum size or 
> {{PageIO.MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE}} then an exception must be thrown with a message 
> that notifies the user of the incorrect inline size value. Note that this 
> should only happen for _new_ indexes, if a nodes is started on top of an 
> existing PDS, no exceptions should be thrown and a warning should be printed 
> instead, to preserve backwards compatibility.
>  # Fix the “Indexed columns of a row cannot be fully inlined into index” 
> warning to recommend at most the maximum allowed inline size.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to