[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-26708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vladimir Steshin updated IGNITE-26708:
--------------------------------------
    Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

> Revise TcpDiscoveryMetricsUpdateMessage
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-26708
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-26708
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Vladimir Steshin
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: IEP-132, discovery, ise
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We have _TcpDiscoveryMetricsUpdateMessage_ and related 
> {_}EVT_NODE_METRICS_UPDATED{_}. And also similar 
> _ClusterMetricsUpdateMessage_ in {_}Communication{_}. Both of them send the 
> metrics. If discovery is not of _TPC_ type (ZooKeeper for instance), then the 
> metrics are sent through {_}Communication{_}:
> {code:java}
> ClusterProcessor:
> sndMetrics = !(ctx.config().getDiscoverySpi() instanceof TcpDiscoverySpi);
> if (sndMetrics) {
>     metricsProvider = ctx.discovery().createMetricsProvider();
>     long updateFreq = ctx.config().getMetricsUpdateFrequency();
>     ctx.timeout().addTimeoutObject(new 
> MetricsUpdateTimeoutObject(updateFreq));
> } {code}
>  
> Why not sending the metrics via _Communication_ only? Pros: fewer discovery 
> messages; no duplication of functionality, messages  and serialization; more 
> lightweight discovery.
> No need of delivery guarantee here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to