[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-28833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18095213#comment-18095213
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-28833:
----------------------------------------

{panel:title=Branch: [pull/13349/head] Base: [master] : Possible Blockers 
(69)|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}
{color:#d04437}Platform .NET (Windows) 3{color} [[tests 
7|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=9197357]]
* exe: 
ClientClusterDiscoveryTestsNoLocalhost.TestClientDiscoversJoinedServersAndRemovesDisconnected
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 2,1% and is not flaky
* exe: 
ClientClusterDiscoveryTestsNoLocalhost.TestClientDiscoveryWithRandomTopologyChanges
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 2,1% and is not flaky
* exe: 
ClientClusterDiscoveryTestsNoLocalhost.TestClientMaintainsConnectionWhenOriginalNodeLeaves(True)
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 2,1% and is not flaky
* exe: 
ClientClusterDiscoveryTestsNoLocalhost.TestClientMaintainsConnectionWhenOriginalNodeLeaves(False)
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 2,1% and is not flaky
* exe: 
ClientClusterDiscoveryTestsNoLocalhost.TestDiscoveryWithoutClientConnectorOnServer
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 2,1% and is not flaky
* exe: 
ClientClusterDiscoveryTestsNoLocalhost.TestPartitionAwarenessRoutesRequestsToNewlyJoinedNodes
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 2,1% and is not flaky
* exe: 
ClientClusterDiscoveryTestsNoLocalhost.TestThinClientDoesNotDiscoverThickClientNodes
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 2,1% and is not flaky

{color:#d04437}PDS (Compatibility){color} [[tests 
62|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=9197359]]
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
IndexTypesCompatibilityTest.testQueryOldIndex[ver=2.17.0] - Test has low fail 
rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
InlineJavaObjectCompatibilityTest.testQueryOldInlinedIndex[ver=2.17.0, 
cfgInlineSize=true] - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not 
flaky
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
InlineJavaObjectCompatibilityTest.testQueryOldInlinedIndex[ver=2.17.0, 
cfgInlineSize=false] - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not 
flaky
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
PersistenceBasicCompatibilityTest.testNodeStartByOldVersionPersistenceData[version=2.17.0]
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
PersistenceBasicCompatibilityTest.testNodeStartByOldVersionPersistenceData[version=2.13.0]
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
PersistenceBasicCompatibilityTest.testNodeStartByOldVersionPersistenceData[version=2.14.0]
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
PersistenceBasicCompatibilityTest.testNodeStartByOldVersionPersistenceData[version=2.15.0]
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
PersistenceBasicCompatibilityTest.testNodeStartByOldVersionPersistenceData[version=2.16.0]
 - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
InlineJavaObjectCompatibilityTest.testQueryOldInlinedIndex[ver=2.13.0, 
cfgInlineSize=false] - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not 
flaky
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
InlineJavaObjectCompatibilityTest.testQueryOldInlinedIndex[ver=2.13.0, 
cfgInlineSize=true] - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not 
flaky
* IgniteCompatibilityBasicTestSuite: 
InlineJavaObjectCompatibilityTest.testQueryOldInlinedIndex[ver=2.14.0, 
cfgInlineSize=false] - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not 
flaky
... and 51 tests blockers

{panel}
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/13349/head] Base: [master] : New Tests 
(42)|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}
{color:#00008b}Cache 13{color} [[tests 
42|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=9196557]]
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: 
SystemViewCacheTest.testCacheViewExpiryPolicyWithInMemory - PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: 
SystemViewCacheTest.testCacheViewExpiryPolicyWithPersist - PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: SystemViewCacheTest.testCacheGroupIo - 
PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: SystemViewCacheTest.testCachesView - 
PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: 
SystemViewCacheTest.testCacheGroupsView - PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: SystemViewServiceTest.testServices - 
PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: 
SystemViewComputeTaskTest.testComputeApply - PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: SystemViewNodesTest.testNodes - 
PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: SystemViewNodesTest.testNodeMetrics - 
PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: 
SystemViewNodesTest.testBaselineNodeAttributes - PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCacheTestSuite13: SystemViewNodesTest.testNodeAttributes 
- PASSED{color}
... and 31 new tests

{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All* 
Results|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=9196693&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]
{color:#ffffff}tcbot-analysis-comment chainBuildId=9196693 
rerunBuildIds=9197327,9197329,9197331,9197333,9197335,9197337{color}

> Add system view for cache locks
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-28833
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-28833
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Aleksey Plekhanov
>            Assignee: Aleksey Plekhanov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ise
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We, currently, have system view only for reentrant locks data structure, but 
> it's impossible to check cache locks (acqired by cache.lock().lock() method 
> or by transactional cache operation).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to