[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-29003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18107258#comment-18107258
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-29003:
----------------------------------------

{panel:title=Branch: [pull/13506/head] Base: [master] : No blockers 
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel}
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/13506/head] Base: [master] : New Tests 
(1)|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}
{color:#00008b}Calcite SQL 3{color} [[tests 
1|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=9304306]]
* {color:#013220}IgniteCalciteTestSuite3: 
UserDefinedFunctionsIntegrationTest.testScalarSubqueriesInTableFunctionArguments
 - PASSED{color}

{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All* 
Results|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=9304339&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]
{color:#ffffff}tcbot-analysis-comment chainBuildId=9304339 
rerunBuildIds=9304554,9304556{color}

> SQL Calcite: Support scalar subqueries in table function arguments
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-29003
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-29003
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Kirill Tkalenko
>            Assignee: Kirill Tkalenko
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-2
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Apache Ignite currently uses Calcite 1.42, which does not support scalar 
> subqueries passed as table function arguments.
> For example:
> {code:java}
> SELECT * FROM TABLE(my_table_function((SELECT value FROM source), 20)); {code}
> The corresponding support was added to Calcite 1.43 under CALCITE-7688. 
> Backport this functionality to the Ignite Calcite module using an isolated 
> planner rule so that it can be easily removed after upgrading to Calcite 1.43.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to