[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-29053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18116168#comment-18116168
]
Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-29053:
----------------------------------------
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/13589/head] Base: [master] : No blockers
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel}
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/13589/head] Base: [master] : New Tests
(7)|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}
{color:#00008b}Calcite SQL 2{color} [[tests
2|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=9344868]]
* {color:#013220}IgniteCalciteTestSuite2:
RecursiveCtePlannerTest.testRecursiveCteOrderByIsIgnored - PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCalciteTestSuite2:
RecursiveCtePlannerTest.testRecursiveCteOrderByWithRowLimitingIsRejected -
PASSED{color}
{color:#00008b}Calcite SQL 3{color} [[tests
5|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=9344869]]
* {color:#013220}IgniteCalciteTestSuite3:
RecursiveCteIntegrationTest.testNonRecursiveCteOrderByWithRowLimiting -
PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCalciteTestSuite3:
RecursiveCteIntegrationTest.testOrderByWithNestedCteShadowing - PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCalciteTestSuite3:
RecursiveCteIntegrationTest.testRecursiveCteOrderByWithRowLimitingIsRejected -
PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCalciteTestSuite3:
RecursiveCteIntegrationTest.testRecursiveCteOrderByWithOuterRowLimiting -
PASSED{color}
* {color:#013220}IgniteCalciteTestSuite3:
RecursiveCteIntegrationTest.testRecursiveCteWithOrderBy - PASSED{color}
{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All*
Results|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=9344902&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]
{color:#ffffff}tcbot-analysis-comment chainBuildId=9344902
rerunBuildIds=9347660,9347662,9347664,9347666,9347668{color}
> SQL Calcite: Handle ORDER BY in recursive CTE
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-29053
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-29053
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Vladislav Pyatkov
> Assignee: Vladislav Pyatkov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: calcite, ignite-2, sql
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> h3. Motivation
> A recursive CTE with an _ORDER BY_ clause applied to its _UNION_ fails
> validation in the Calcite SQL engine:
> {code}
> WITH RECURSIVE numbers(n) AS (
> SELECT 1
> UNION ALL
> SELECT n + 1
> FROM numbers
> WHERE n < 3
> ORDER BY n
> )
> SELECT n
> FROM numbers
> ORDER BY n;
> {code}
> The same issue occurs when the RECURSIVE keyword is omitted.
> The query fails with:
> {noformat}
> Object 'NUMBERS' not found
> {noformat}
> Calcite rewrites the internal ORDER BY into a wrapping SELECT, preventing
> correct recursive CTE recognition and scope resolution.
> h3. Definition of done
> * Accept and ignore ORDER BY applied to the recursive UNION when no
> row-limiting clause is present. The example should return 1, 2, 3.
> * Reject an internal ORDER BY combined with FETCH, LIMIT, or OFFSET with
> UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION and a clear error message.
> * Apply the same behavior with and without the RECURSIVE keyword.
> * Preserve ordering and row limiting in non-recursive CTEs and in queries
> consuming the recursive CTE.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
