[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-29045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18119964#comment-18119964
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-29045:
----------------------------------------

Calcite SQL: Added support for Java temporal types in user-defined function and 
table function parameters and results.

The Release Note field has been filled with the wording above. Please review it 
and edit it if needed.

> SQL Calcite: Support Java temporal types in UDF and UDTF parameters and 
> results
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-29045
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-29045
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kirill Tkalenko
>            Assignee: Kirill Tkalenko
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: calcite, ignite-2, sql
>             Fix For: 2.19
>
>          Time Spent: 3h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Java UDFs and UDTFs using temporal types fail because some {{java.time}} 
> types are mapped to {{{}OTHER{}}}, and SQL temporal values are represented 
> internally as {{{}Integer{}}}/{{{}Long{}}} without consistent conversion at 
> the function boundary.
> Add SQL type mapping and bidirectional conversion for JDBC temporal types, 
> {{{}java.util.Date{}}}, {{{}LocalDate{}}}, {{{}LocalTime{}}}, 
> {{{}LocalDateTime{}}}, {{{}Duration{}}}, and {{Period}} in UDF and UDTF 
> parameters and results. User-defined functions should use Java temporal types 
> without depending on Calcite’s internal representation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to