[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15814552#comment-15814552
 ] 

Alexander Paschenko commented on IGNITE-4489:
---------------------------------------------

Re-structured the code for better maintainability (split 
{{DmlStatementsProcessor}} that started getting huge into classes that 
encompass logic of INSERT, UPDATE, and MERGE); added a test. Started TC tests, 
after they pass will convert this to *patch available*.
I also suggest that we release fixes for this, as well as IGNITE-4363 and 
IGNITE-4490 in a single branch (corresponding to this issue) as long as this 
looks like a major improvement and and the same time depends on fixes from 
aforementioned branches. [~vozerov]

> Maintain correct MERGE semantic in DML
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-4489
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4489
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 1.8
>            Reporter: Alexander Paschenko
>            Assignee: Alexander Paschenko
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> Currently it's impossible to MERGE object in UPDATE style - i.e. when key is 
> present in cache, unaffected field values should be retained, and instead of 
> building new object we should base it on previous one for given key.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to