[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16015531#comment-16015531
]
Yakov Zhdanov commented on IGNITE-4887:
---------------------------------------
[~IDGorkov], I see your point and agree that currently Ignite misses this
functionality. Thanks for clarifications! Before we go forward, can you please
provide couple of real-life examples that rely on end() and resume()? I want to
understand the scenarios and then understand what needs to be changed in
Ignite.
Thanks!
> Support for starting transaction in another thread
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-4887
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4887
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: general
> Affects Versions: 1.9
> Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov
> Assignee: Alexey Kuznetsov
>
> Consider the following pseudo-code:
> {code:xml}
> IgniteTransactions transactions = ignite1.transactions();
> Transaction tx = startTransaction(transactions);
> cache.put("key1", 1);
> tx.stop();
> {code}
> And in another thread:
> {code:xml}
> transactions.txStart(tx);
> cache.put("key3", 3);
> cache.remove("key2");
> tx.commit();
> {code}
> The Api should be implemented , that let you continue transaction in another
> thread.
> method stop() should mark the transaction as unavailable for further commit.
> method txStart() should resume the transaction.
> reason behind the proposal :
> Consider the next scenario:
> we begin transaction, doing some changes and start async future that will be
> able to introduce futher changes into transaction and commit it in the end.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
