[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16049255#comment-16049255
]
Alexander Paschenko edited comment on IGNITE-5465 at 6/14/17 2:53 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's stack trace of one error observed during test run
{code}
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Getting affinity for topology version earlier
than affinity is calculated [locNode=TcpDiscoveryNode
[id=c71c7215-2939-4e15-8f27-3124aa600000, addrs=[127.0.0.1],
sockAddrs=[/127.0.0.1:47500], discPort=47500, order=1, intOrder=1,
lastExchangeTime=1497451492097, loc=true, ver=2.1.0#19700101-sha1:00000000,
isClient=false], grp=SQL_PUBLIC_CITY, topVer=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4,
minorTopVer=7], head=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=9],
history=[AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=9]]]
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.affinity.GridAffinityAssignmentCache.cachedAffinity(GridAffinityAssignmentCache.java:464)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheGroupContext.processAffinityAssignmentRequest0(CacheGroupContext.java:887)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheGroupContext.processAffinityAssignmentRequest(CacheGroupContext.java:873)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheGroupContext.access$000(CacheGroupContext.java:68)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheGroupContext$2.apply(CacheGroupContext.java:835)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheGroupContext$2.apply(CacheGroupContext.java:833)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.processMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:911)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.onMessage0(GridCacheIoManager.java:430)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:349)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:294)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.access$100(GridCacheIoManager.java:102)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager$1$1$1.run(GridCacheIoManager.java:197)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.wrapThreadLoader(IgniteUtils.java:6697)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.closure.GridClosureProcessor$1.body(GridClosureProcessor.java:817)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
{code}
was (Author: al.psc):
{code}
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Getting affinity for topology version earlier
than affinity is calculated [locNode=TcpDiscoveryNode
[id=c71c7215-2939-4e15-8f27-3124aa600000, addrs=[127.0.0.1],
sockAddrs=[/127.0.0.1:47500], discPort=47500, order=1, intOrder=1,
lastExchangeTime=1497451492097, loc=true, ver=2.1.0#19700101-sha1:00000000,
isClient=false], grp=SQL_PUBLIC_CITY, topVer=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4,
minorTopVer=7], head=AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=9],
history=[AffinityTopologyVersion [topVer=4, minorTopVer=9]]]
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.affinity.GridAffinityAssignmentCache.cachedAffinity(GridAffinityAssignmentCache.java:464)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheGroupContext.processAffinityAssignmentRequest0(CacheGroupContext.java:887)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheGroupContext.processAffinityAssignmentRequest(CacheGroupContext.java:873)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheGroupContext.access$000(CacheGroupContext.java:68)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheGroupContext$2.apply(CacheGroupContext.java:835)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheGroupContext$2.apply(CacheGroupContext.java:833)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.processMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:911)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.onMessage0(GridCacheIoManager.java:430)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:349)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.handleMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:294)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.access$100(GridCacheIoManager.java:102)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager$1$1$1.run(GridCacheIoManager.java:197)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.wrapThreadLoader(IgniteUtils.java:6697)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.closure.GridClosureProcessor$1.body(GridClosureProcessor.java:817)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
{code}
> CREATE TABLE: add multithreaded tests
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-5465
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5465
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: sql
> Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
> Assignee: Alexander Paschenko
> Labels: important
> Fix For: 2.1
>
>
> We need to add multithreaded tests for {{CREATE TABLE}} and {{DROP TABLE}}
> commands in a similar way as we did that for indexes
> ({{DynamicIndexAbstractConcurrentSelfTest}}.
> Let's test the following case:
> - Create and drop of the same several tables from different threads and
> different nodes (including a client).
> - Success criteria: nothing hangs and in the end table/cache is either
> doesn't exist, or exists and operational (verify through DML and SELECT
> queries).
> AFAIK there is a bug in how we start caches dynamically, so honestly there is
> a high chance that this test will not work as expected due to non-SQL bugs.
> So at the very least we must ensure that it either works, or doesn't work due
> to a problem outside of DDL engine.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
