[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16073561#comment-16073561
]
Alexey Kuznetsov commented on IGNITE-4887:
------------------------------------------
[~yzhdanov] Your second and third test proposals would combine into one
mechanism, which checks every tx operation(except resume) is performed by
thread, owning the tx. Except operation can be executed by every thread, and
this thread becomes tx owner. This technic would ensure thread safety.
> Support for starting transaction in another thread
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-4887
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4887
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: general
> Affects Versions: 1.9
> Reporter: Alexey Kuznetsov
> Assignee: Alexey Kuznetsov
> Attachments: HangTest.txt
>
>
> Consider the following pseudo-code:
> {code:xml}
> IgniteTransactions transactions = ignite1.transactions();
> Transaction tx = startTransaction(transactions);
> cache.put("key1", 1);
> tx.stop();
> {code}
> And in another thread:
> {code:xml}
> transactions.txStart(tx);
> cache.put("key3", 3);
> cache.remove("key2");
> tx.commit();
> {code}
> The Api should be implemented , that let you continue transaction in another
> thread.
> method stop() should mark the transaction as unavailable for further commit.
> method txStart() should resume the transaction.
> reason behind the proposal :
> Consider the next scenario:
> we begin transaction, doing some changes and start async future that will be
> able to introduce futher changes into transaction and commit it in the end.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
