[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16129007#comment-16129007
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-5790:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user alamar opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2460

    IGNITE-5790 SQL: Append UUID to names of Ignite instances opened by JDBC

    All Ignite instances created by Jdbc driver should now be either named or 
appended with ignite-jdbc-driver-UUID to avoid conflicting with instances 
created in other places.
    
    Had to inline parts of IgnitionEx.start() to apply changes to every 
decision branch.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/alamar/ignite ignite-5790

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2460.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2460
    
----
commit 05c45747750e10fc094a09a2189f895ffd768520
Author: Ilya Kasnacheev <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-08-16T15:26:43Z

    IGNITE-5790 SQL: Append UUID to names of Ignite instances opened by JDBC.

----


> Xml config can not be used in jdbs and user code simultaneously
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-5790
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5790
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jdbc
>    Affects Versions: 2.1
>            Reporter: Mikhail Cherkasov
>            Assignee: Ilya Kasnacheev
>             Fix For: 2.2
>
>
> when user uses the same xml config for jdbc driver and for his own ignite 
> instance there can be :
> java.sql.SQLException: Failed to start Ignite node.
> Caused by: class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Ignite instance 
> with this name has already been started: CustomeIgniteName
> because JDBC creates separate ignite instance, while user already has one 
> with the same name.
> Of course that can be easily workarounded, user can support two configs or 
> create jdbc connect first and then use Ignition.getOrStart().
> However it's inconvenient for user and should be treated as usability issue.
> I see 2 solutions:
> 1) jdbc driver should use Ignition.getOrStart()
> 2) jdbc driver should connection string as ignite name.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to