[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16152216#comment-16152216
]
Pavel Tupitsyn commented on IGNITE-6236:
----------------------------------------
1) I think we have decided to include some flags in every message, see parent
ticket and related dev list discussion.
2) Let's do exception handling as a separate ticket.
3) On the protocol level this looks simpler to me. Operation succeeded? Write
1. Otherwise 0. Why would I write a pointless type code here?
4) Ok, let's see if we can work without metadata in this ticket and handle that
later.
5) Ok.
> .NET: Thin client: cache.Get and Put for user types
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-6236
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6236
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: platforms
> Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Labels: .NET
> Fix For: 2.3
>
>
> Cache operations on user types require proper metadata handling. Make sure
> dynamic type registration works.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
