[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16280554#comment-16280554
]
Pavel Tupitsyn edited comment on IGNITE-7109 at 12/6/17 5:36 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmarks added. Current async implementation ({{BeginSend}}/{{BeginReceive}})
is 30% slower than master ({{Send}}/{{Receive}}).
This appears to be a common issue:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9915101/performance-of-receiveasync-vs-beginreceive
We should try performing a request synchronously and then falling back to async
if response is not quickly available (see comments to the accepted answer).
was (Author: ptupitsyn):
Benchmarks added. Current async implementation ({{BeginSend}}/{{BeginReceive}})
is 30% slower than master.
This appears to be a common issue:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9915101/performance-of-receiveasync-vs-beginreceive
We should try performing a request synchronously and then falling back to async
if response is not quickly available (see comments to the accepted answer).
> .NET: Thin client: Async cache operations
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-7109
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7109
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: platforms, thin client
> Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Labels: .NET
> Fix For: 2.4
>
>
> Add async operations to {{ICacheClient}}.
> Thin client suppots asynchrony with requestId mechanism. Make sure it works
> with .NET.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
