[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pavel Pereslegin updated IGNITE-7823:
-------------------------------------
Description:
Existing collocated version of {{IgniteSet}} datastructure is good enough for
small sets.
For big sets it's too expensive to maintain redundant onheap data copies. Thus
it would be better to use separate cache for non collocated {{IgniteSet}}
version. The difference between these two kinds of sets should be properly
documented afterwards.
was:Existing {{IgniteSet}} datastructure is good enough for small sets. For
big sets it's too expensive to maintain redundant onheap data copies. Thus we'd
better to add new {{IgniteCache::asSet}} method returning set adapter to
existing cache. The difference between these two kinds of sets should be
properly documented afterwards.
> Separate cache for non collocated IgniteSet.
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-7823
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7823
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: data structures
> Reporter: Andrey Kuznetsov
> Assignee: Pavel Pereslegin
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.6
>
>
> Existing collocated version of {{IgniteSet}} datastructure is good enough for
> small sets.
> For big sets it's too expensive to maintain redundant onheap data copies.
> Thus it would be better to use separate cache for non collocated
> {{IgniteSet}} version. The difference between these two kinds of sets should
> be properly documented afterwards.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
