[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16452724#comment-16452724
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-8390:
----------------------------------------
GitHub user Jokser opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3917
IGNITE-8390 Fixed incorrect assertion during WAL historical rebalance
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-8390
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3917.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #3917
----
commit 20ba426898971ecbd0e41a4640bee07e704a9b58
Author: Pavel Kovalenko <jokserfn@...>
Date: 2018-04-25T17:29:27Z
IGNITE-8390 Fixed incorrect assertion during WAL historical rebalance.
commit b38434870ed865c4320520821ccb3290e0054fe2
Author: Pavel Kovalenko <jokserfn@...>
Date: 2018-04-25T17:34:14Z
IGNITE-8390 Corrected tests.
----
> WAL historical rebalance is not able to process cache.remove() updates
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-8390
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8390
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cache
> Affects Versions: 2.4
> Reporter: Pavel Kovalenko
> Assignee: Pavel Kovalenko
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.5
>
>
> WAL historical rebalance fails on supplier when process entry remove with
> following assertion:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.AssertionError: GridCacheEntryInfo [key=KeyCacheObjectImpl
> [part=-1, val=2, hasValBytes=true], cacheId=94416770, val=null, ttl=0,
> expireTime=0, ver=GridCacheVersion [topVer=136155335, order=1524675346187,
> nodeOrder=1], isNew=false, deleted=false]
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionSupplyMessage.addEntry0(GridDhtPartitionSupplyMessage.java:220)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionSupplier.handleDemandMessage(GridDhtPartitionSupplier.java:381)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPreloader.handleDemandMessage(GridDhtPreloader.java:364)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$5.apply(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:379)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$5.apply(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:364)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.processMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:1054)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.onMessage0(GridCacheIoManager.java:579)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.access$700(GridCacheIoManager.java:99)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager$OrderedMessageListener.onMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:1603)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.invokeListener(GridIoManager.java:1556)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.access$4100(GridIoManager.java:125)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager$GridCommunicationMessageSet.unwind(GridIoManager.java:2752)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.unwindMessageSet(GridIoManager.java:1516)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.access$4400(GridIoManager.java:125)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager$10.run(GridIoManager.java:1485)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {noformat}
> Obviously this assertion will work correctly only for full rebalance. We
> should either soft assertion for historical rebalance case or disable it.
> In case of disabled assertion everything works well and rebalance finished
> properly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
