[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16474056#comment-16474056
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-8474:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user sergey-chugunov-1985 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3990

    IGNITE-8474 skipForExchangeMerge property changed to 'true'

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-8474

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3990.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #3990
    
----
commit 853908d1f9eaaeea9dbbf8dbc1f63c02fc59b4a0
Author: Sergey Chugunov <sergey.chugunov@...>
Date:   2018-05-14T10:52:58Z

    IGNITE-8474 skipForExchangeMerge property changed to 'true'

----


> WalStateNodeLeaveExchangeTask prevents merge exchanges on leaving many nodes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-8474
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8474
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>            Reporter: Sergey Chugunov
>            Assignee: Sergey Chugunov
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.6
>
>
> Exchange merge mechanism provides huge optimization when a lot of nodes join 
> or leave cluster simultaneously.
> In IGNITE-7003 WalStateNodeLeaveExchangeTask custom exchange task was added 
> which is generated for each NODE_LEFT/NODE_FAILED event.
> Because of property skipForExchangeMerge set to false on this task it 
> prohibits exchange merge optimization.
> The property needs to be reconsidered and changed if it is not crucial for 
> this functionality.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to