[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16503044#comment-16503044
]
Alexey Kuznetsov edited comment on IGNITE-955 at 6/6/18 2:18 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[~vkulichenko] [~yzhdanov]
1)What is the point of creating continuous query without local listener ?
2)What if we set transformer via _setRemoteTransformerFactory_ only, should
local listener be optional?
3)If local listener not set, primary node must not send notifications to node,
started continuous query, am I right ?
4)If no listeners or filters set, should exception be thrown ? I, believe yes
was (Author: alexey kuznetsov):
[~vkulichenko] [~yzhdanov]
1)What is the point of creating continuous query without local listener ?
2)What if we set transformer via _setRemoteTransformerFactory_ only, should
local listener be optional?
3)If no listeners or filters set, should exception be thrown ? I, believe yes
> Local listener in continuous queries should not be mandatory
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-955
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-955
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: cache
> Affects Versions: sprint-4
> Reporter: Valentin Kulichenko
> Assignee: Alexey Kuznetsov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: Usability
>
> We need to support the use case when remote filter is needed, but local
> listener is not (filter always returns {{false}}).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
