[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16512275#comment-16512275
 ] 

Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-7015:
-----------------------------------------

[~npordash], this specific fix is not likely to be merged in the nearest time. 
In-place updates are very complicated things and are not possible in general 
case. However, at this point we understand that slow index updates are caused 
by inefficient index implementation, and we are working on several tickets to 
improve it: 

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8384

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8386

 

> SQL: Index should be updated only when relevant values changed
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-7015
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7015
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: sql
>            Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
>            Assignee: Roman Kondakov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: iep-19, performance
>
> See {{GridH2Table.update}} method. Whenever value is updated, we propagate it 
> to all indexes. Consider the following case:
> 1) Old row is not null, so this is "update", not "create".
> 2) Link hasn't changed
> 3) Indexed fields haven't changed
> If all conditions are met, we can skip index update completely, as state 
> before and after will be the same. This is especially important when 
> persistence is enabled because currently we generate unnecessary dirty pages 
> what increases IO pressure.
> Suggested fix:
> 1) Iterate over index columns, skipping key and affinity columns (as they are 
> guaranteed to be the same);
> 2) Compare relevant index columns of both old and new rows
> 3) If all columns are equal, do nothing.
> Fields should be read through {{GridH2KeyValueRowOnheap#getValue}}, because 
> in this case we will re-use value cache transparently.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to