[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16520809#comment-16520809
]
Valentin Kulichenko commented on IGNITE-8740:
---------------------------------------------
Also, I think we should add {{setIgnite(Ignite ignite)}} method to
{{SpringCacheManager}} and {{SpringTransactionManager}}. That would be a
cleaner way to do the injection in case both {{IgniteSpringBean}} and one of
{{SpringCacheManager}}/{{SpringTransactionManager}} are configured in the same
context.
Agree?
> Support reuse of already initialized Ignite in IgniteSpringBean
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-8740
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8740
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: spring
> Affects Versions: 2.4
> Reporter: Ilya Kasnacheev
> Assignee: Amir Akhmedov
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.6
>
>
> See
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/IgniteSpringBean-amp-Ignite-SpringTransactionManager-broken-with-2-4-td21667.html#a21724
> (there's patch available)
> The idea is to introduce a workaround for users hit by IGNITE-6555, which
> unfortunately broke some scenarios.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
