[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16545150#comment-16545150
 ] 

kcheng.mvp commented on IGNITE-9005:
------------------------------------

[~dpavlov],

I checked the source code and found that this issue may be caused by this line

org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheProcessor #1452

*CacheEvictionManager evictMgr = (nearEnabled || cfg.isOnheapCacheEnabled()) ? 
new GridCacheEvictionManager() : new CacheOffheapEvictionManager();*


as in this case a new *CacheOffheapEvictionManager()* will return, but this 
implementation does not do any eviction bean register/unregister, as there are 
no any policy.

are my findings wrong? 

> Eviction policy MBeans change failed LifecycleAwareTest on cache name 
> injectoin
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-9005
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9005
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Test
>            Reporter: Dmitriy Pavlov
>            Assignee: kcheng.mvp
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: MakeTeamcityGreenAgain
>             Fix For: 2.7
>
>
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/MTCGA-new-failures-in-builds-1485687-needs-to-be-handled-td32531.html
> New test failure detected 
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&testNameId=7246907407546697403&branch=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=testDetails
> after merging 
> IGNITE-8776 Eviction policy MBeans are never registered if 
> evictionPolicyFactory is used 
> Revert of commit makes test passing.
> Locally test also failed. Failed with message
> {noformat}
> Unexpected cache name for 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheLifecycleAwareSelfTest$TestEvictionPolicy@322714f4
>  expected:<cache> but was:<null>
> {noformat}
> Message of failure seems to be related to TestEvictionPolicy instance from 
> test class. 
> Seems that returing call to cctx.kernalContext (). resource (). 
> injectCacheName (rsrc, cfg.getName ()); should fix issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to