[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16623913#comment-16623913
]
Taras Ledkov commented on IGNITE-4150:
--------------------------------------
Simple join benchmark configuration:
- standalone Ignite node, queries run locally;
- tables:
{{CREATE TABLE person (id long, orgId long, name varchar, PRIMARY KEY (id,
orgId))}}
{{CREATE TABLE organization (id long primary key, name varchar)}}
- Person contains 100K rows, Organization - 10K rows;
- queries:
selects 1 row: {{SELECT * FROM person p join organization o on p.orgId=o.id
WHERE p.id = ? order by p.id}}
selects 1k rows: {{SELECT * FROM person p join organization o on p.orgId=o.id
WHERE p.id between ? and ? order by p.id}}
joins full table and select 1k rows; {{SELECT * FROM person p join organization
o on p.orgId=o.id order by p.id LIMIT 1000}}
- *P-P* - partitioned Person, partitioned Organization
- *P-R* - replicated Person, partitioned Organization
Results (ops / sec):
|| || master P-P || 4150 P-P || master P-R || 4150 P-R ||
| 1 row | 18.69 | 19.51 | 19.13 | 19.28 |
| 1k rows | 16.34 | 15.86 | 16.40 | 16.43 |
| all table join 1k rows | 1.92 | 2.09 | 1.80 | 2.15 |
> B-Tree index cannot be used efficiently with IN clause.
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-4150
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4150
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: sql
> Affects Versions: 1.7
> Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
> Assignee: Taras Ledkov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 2.7
>
>
> Consider the following query:
> {code}
> SELECT * FROM table
> WHERE a = ? AND b IN (?, ?)
> {code}
> If there is an index {{(a, b)}}, it will not be used properly: only column
> {{a}} will be used. This will leads to multiple unnecessary comparisons.
> Most obvious way to fix that - use temporary table and {{JOIN}}. However,
> this approach doesn't work well when there are multiple {{IN}}'s.
> Proper solution would be to hack deeper into H2.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)