[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16625674#comment-16625674
]
Stuart Macdonald commented on IGNITE-9228:
------------------------------------------
We have been discussing the approach to this change on the dev list. We agreed
an approach and the PR is now ready for re-review.
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Table-Names-in-Spark-Catalog-td34042.html
> Spark SQL Table Schema Specification
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-9228
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9228
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: spark
> Affects Versions: 2.6
> Reporter: Stuart Macdonald
> Assignee: Stuart Macdonald
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7
>
>
> The Ignite Spark SQL interface currently takes just “table name” as a
> parameter which it uses to supply a Spark dataset with data from the
> underlying Ignite SQL table with that name.
> To do this it loops through each cache and finds the first one with the
> given table name [1]. This causes issues if there are multiple tables
> registered in different schema with the same table name as you can only
> access one of those from Spark. We could either:
> 1. Pass an extra parameter through the Ignite Spark data source which
> optionally specifies the schema name.
> 2. Support namespacing in the existing table name parameter, ie
> “schemaName.tableName”
> [1
> ]https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/ca973ad99c6112160a305df05be9458e29f88307/modules/spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/ignite/spark/impl/package.scala#L119
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
