[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nikolay Izhikov updated IGNITE-6854:
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.7)
                   2.8

> Enabling Persistent Memory for Ignite
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-6854
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6854
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 2.3
>            Reporter: Mulugeta Mammo
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> Ignite, when persistence mode is enabled, stores data and indexes on disk. To 
> minimize the latency of disks, several tuning options can be applied. Setting 
> the page size of a memory region to match the page size of the underlying 
> storage, using a separate disk for the WAL, and using production-level SSDs 
> are just a few of them [ 
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/durable-memory-tuning#section-native-persistence-related-tuning
>  ]. 
>  
> A persistent memory store with low latency and high capacity offers a viable 
> alternative to disks. In light of this, we are proposing to make use of our 
> Low Level Persistent Library (LLPL), 
> https://github.com/pmem/pcj/tree/master/LLPL, to offer a persistent memory 
> storage for Ignite. 
>  
> At this point, we envision two distinct implementation options:
> # Data and indexes will continue to be stored in the off-heap memory but the 
> disk will be replaced by a persistent memory. Since persistence memory in 
> this option is not a file system, the logic currently offered by WAL file and 
> the partition files would have to be implemented from scratch.
> # In this option, we eliminate the current check-point process and the WAL 
> file. We will use a memory region defined by LLPL to store data and indexes. 
> There will be no off-heap memory. DRAM will be exclusively used to store hot 
> cache entries just like the on-heap cache is in the current implementation. 
>   
>  
> In both cases, there are more details and subtleties that have to handled – 
> e.g. the atomic and transactional guarantees offered. More clarifications 
> will be given as we go along.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to