[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16644824#comment-16644824
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-9834:
---------------------------------------

{panel:title=Possible 
Blockers|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}
{color:#d04437}PDS (Direct IO) 1{color} [[tests 0 JVM CRASH , Exit Code 
|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=2049654]]

{color:#d04437}PDS (Indexing){color} [[tests 0 Exit Code 
|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=2049660]]
* WalRolloverRecordLoggingFsyncTest.testAvoidInfinityWaitingOnRolloverOfSegment 
(last started)

{color:#d04437}PDS 1{color} [[tests 
1|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=2049658]]
* IgnitePdsTestSuite: BPlusTreePageMemoryImplTest.testMassiveRemove2_false - 
0,0% fails in last 100 master runs.

{panel}
[TeamCity Run 
All|http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=2049702&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]

> ClientImpl shouldn't fail JVM with 130 error code after node validation errors
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-9834
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9834
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Alexey Platonov
>            Assignee: Alexey Platonov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: MakeTeamcityGreenAgain
>
> In the current number of Ignite if client (tcp-client-disco-msg-worker) 
> receive validation error message represented by 
> TcpDiscoveryCheckFailedMessage then client fail with 130 error code. 
> Semantically such behavior is invalid. Client must cancel own work in normal 
> order.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to