[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16666547#comment-16666547
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-9828:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user rkondakov opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5189

    IGNITE-9828: Continuous query failover.

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-9828

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5189.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #5189
    
----
commit 8dfb5d3da4d92d7a7b3c41ff5c7dcd909a6042a1
Author: rkondakov <kondakov87@...>
Date:   2018-10-25T11:02:59Z

    IGNITE-9828: Continuous query failover.

----


> MVCC: Continuous query failover.
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-9828
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9828
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: mvcc
>            Reporter: Roman Kondakov
>            Assignee: Roman Kondakov
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.7
>
>
> We need to implement failover procedure for CQ with MVCC caches. Thoughts:
>  * CQ failover tests should be adopted for mvcc scenarios. See 
> {{IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite4}}
>  * We need to ensure the correctness of CQ and partition counters consistency 
> in cases when some of TX participants are in prepared state and others are 
> marked as rollback only. It looks like it doesn't work properly now.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to