[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16683558#comment-16683558
]
Alexey Kuznetsov commented on IGNITE-10204:
-------------------------------------------
I think we do not need to fix this issue. "Allow distributed joins" - looks
very strange for me. As a matter of fact Ignite the DISTRIBUTED system and all
queries by default are DISTRIBUTED. But in some cases data is NOT COLLOCATED,
and we need a special parameter to be passed to Queries API to allow JOIN on
such data and we have a WARNING in tooltip for this mode, that this mode may
require a lot of heap.
[~vozerov], what do you think (as SQL expert)?
> Web Console: Rename "Allow non-collocated joins" checkbox
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-10204
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10204
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: UI, wizards
> Reporter: Vica Abramova
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: Allow screen.png
>
>
> Rename checkbox "Allow non-collocated joins" => "Allow distributed joins"
> In the Web Console's query tab, it says "Allow non-collocated joins". I
> propose that this be renamed to "Allow distributed joins". I say that
> because in your documentation it refers to it as distributed joins.
> Inconsistent naming caused some confusion to our development teams.
> Consistent naming can solve this.
> https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/distributed-joins
> Attached is screenshot of what I get from google when search for
> non-collocated joins which seems to suggests that distrbuted joins is the
> preferred terminology.
> https://www.google.com/search?q=GridGain+non-collocated+joins
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
