[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pavel Voronkin updated IGNITE-10417:
------------------------------------
    Description: 
1) ServerImpl:5455 notifyDiscoveryListener can not be called in case of 
spiState != CONNECTED, for example DISCONNECTING which is valid state 
nevetheless inside notifyDiscoveryListener we check spiState == CONNECTED || 
spiState == DISCONNECTING, also we need to improve logging in 
notifyDiscoveryListener().

2)  Improve logging on duplicated custom discovery event.

3) Add assert if msg.creatorNodeId() doesn't exist in topology this is bad 
behaviour taht should lead to node fail.

 

 

 

 

 

  was:
1) ServerImpl: notifyDiscoveryListener can not be called in case of spiState != 
CONNECTED, for example DISCONNECTING which is valid state nevetheless inside 
notifyDiscoveryListener we check spiState == CONNECTED || spiState == 
DISCONNECTING, also we need to improve logging in notifyDiscoveryListener().

2)  Improve logging on duplicated custom event.

3) Add assert if msg.creatorNodeId() doesn't exist in topology this is bad 
behaviour taht should lead to node fail.

 

 

 

 

 


> notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-10417
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10417
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Pavel Voronkin
>            Assignee: Pavel Voronkin
>            Priority: Major
>
> 1) ServerImpl:5455 notifyDiscoveryListener can not be called in case of 
> spiState != CONNECTED, for example DISCONNECTING which is valid state 
> nevetheless inside notifyDiscoveryListener we check spiState == CONNECTED || 
> spiState == DISCONNECTING, also we need to improve logging in 
> notifyDiscoveryListener().
> 2)  Improve logging on duplicated custom discovery event.
> 3) Add assert if msg.creatorNodeId() doesn't exist in topology this is bad 
> behaviour taht should lead to node fail.
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to