[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16703360#comment-16703360
]
Alexey Goncharuk commented on IGNITE-10058:
-------------------------------------------
[~xtern], I see that you've changed the rebalance logic to assume that
rebalance is finished even if there is a local LOST partition. Can you please
elaborate on the reasons for this change?
We need to make sure that there are tests that check that the following
partition state transition is impossible - MOVING -> LOST (partially
rebalanced) -> OWNING.
> resetLostPartitions() leaves an additional copy of a partition in the cluster
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-10058
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10058
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Stanislav Lukyanov
> Assignee: Pavel Pereslegin
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> If there are several copies of a LOST partition, resetLostPartitions() will
> leave all of them in the cluster as OWNING.
> Scenario:
> 1) Start 4 nodes, a cache with backups=0 and READ_WRITE_SAFE, fill the cache
> 2) Stop one node - some partitions are recreated on the remaining nodes as
> LOST
> 3) Start one node - the LOST partitions are being rebalanced to the new node
> from the existing ones
> 4) Wait for rebalance to complete
> 5) Call resetLostPartitions()
> After that the partitions that were LOST become OWNING on all nodes that had
> them. Eviction of these partitions doesn't start.
> Need to correctly evict additional copies of LOST partitions either after
> rebalance on step 4 or after resetLostPartitions() call on step 5.
> Current resetLostPartitions() implementation does call checkEvictions(), but
> the ready affinity assignment contains several nodes per partition for some
> reason.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
