[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16704720#comment-16704720
 ] 

Taras Ledkov commented on IGNITE-5439:
--------------------------------------

[~alapin], the patch looks good in general.
The SQL tests on TC  & protocol compatibility are OK.

My comments:
# You add the method {{JdbcThinTcpIo#sendRequestRaw}} to use for send 
{{JdbcQueryCancelRequest}}. Please take a look that {{sendRequest}} and 
{{sendBatchRequestNoWaitResponse}} methods. Is it possible to remove code 
duplication there (send message)?
# 
{{org.apache.ignite.internal.jdbc.thin.JdbcThinTcpIo#sendBatchRequestNoWaitResponse}}
 TODO comment. Not complete?
# The atomic operations are not used for the flag 
{{JdbcThinStatement#canceled}}. Moreover the most flag usages are inside 
*synchronize* blocks. Does we really need in {{AtomicBoolean}}?
# Please review my minor changes.



> JDBC thin: support query cancel
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-5439
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5439
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: jdbc
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: Taras Ledkov
>            Assignee: Alexander Lapin
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> The JDBC {{Statement.cancel}} method must be supported.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to