[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16726067#comment-16726067
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-10730:
-----------------------------------------

GitHub user AMashenkov opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5714

    IGNITE-10730: Batch mvcc wal records in tx.

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-10730

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5714.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #5714
    
----
commit dfe77f6d85c28ad8ef97447105a1480ce43bee8a
Author: Andrey V. Mashenkov <andrey.mashenkov@...>
Date:   2018-12-20T17:32:19Z

    IGNITE-10730: WIP.

----


> MVCC TX: Batch WAL datarecords
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-10730
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10730
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: mvcc
>            Reporter: Igor Seliverstov
>            Assignee: Andrew Mashenkov
>            Priority: Major
>
> on MVCC updates we make changes one by one and WAL records are written 
> straight after successful update under the same checkpoint lock. This 
> produces contention on wal flush operations and harm overall performance. But 
> we need only one guarantee - all the records have to be written into the log 
> before prepare start. That means we free to batch such writes (for example 10 
> rows in one data record) it shouldn't cause memory issues but will resolve 
> contention.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to