[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16726256#comment-16726256
]
Eduard Shangareev commented on IGNITE-8911:
-------------------------------------------
[~DmitriyGovorukhin], I don't think that statement in your first point is true.
As I see, GridStripedReadWriteLock contains collections of java ReadWriteLock
and it is all.
> While cache is restarting it's possible to start new cache with this name
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-8911
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8911
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Eduard Shangareev
> Assignee: Eduard Shangareev
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> We have the state "restarting" for caches when we certainly now that these
> caches would start at some moment in future. But we could start new cache
> with the same name.
> Plus, NPE is throwing when we try to get proxy for such caches (in
> "restarting" state).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
