[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16729758#comment-16729758
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-10821:
-----------------------------------------

GitHub user Jokser opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5766

    IGNITE-10821 Affinity recalculation optimizations

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-10821

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5766.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #5766
    
----
commit a74768fdcb80d68370c504da225a8dfb9db9f7ec
Author: Pavel Kovalenko <jokserfn@...>
Date:   2018-12-27T17:52:54Z

    IGNITE-10821 Optimize reassignment enforce on coordinator.
    
    Signed-off-by: Pavel Kovalenko <[email protected]>

----


> Caching affinity with affinity similarity key is broken
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-10821
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10821
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cache
>    Affects Versions: 2.8
>            Reporter: Pavel Kovalenko
>            Assignee: Pavel Kovalenko
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> When some cache groups have the same affinity function, number of partitions, 
> backups and the same node filter they can use the same affinity distribution 
> without needs for explicit recalculating. These parameters are called as 
> "Affinity similarity key". 
> In case of affinity recalculation caching affinity using this key may 
> speed-up the process.
> However, after https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9561 merge this 
> mechanishm become broken, because parallell execution of affinity 
> recalculation for the similar affinity groups leads to caching affinity 
> misses.
> To fix it we should couple together similar affinity groups and run affinity 
> recalculation for them in one thread, caching previous results.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to