[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16747402#comment-16747402
 ] 

Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-10754:
------------------------------------------

[~jooger], implementation still doesn't look correct to me. 
# First question is why we return {{RunningQueryManager.register}} returns 
{{GridRunningQueryInfo}}, while in reality {{Long}} iD is enough, as nothing 
else from {{GridRunningQueryInfo}} is used anywhere. 
# Why {{RunningQueryManager.unregister}} methods are not void? Their results 
are not used anywhere.
# {{RunningQueryManager.unregister}} - when {{run,remove}} is called, 
subsequent call to query history tracker do not perform {{null}} check. As a 
result, one may get NPE in {{close}} is called several times on some cursor.

> Query history statistics API
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-10754
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10754
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: sql
>            Reporter: Yury Gerzhedovich
>            Assignee: Yury Gerzhedovich
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: iep-29, monitoring
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As of now we have query statistics 
> (*_org.apache.ignite.IgniteCache#queryMetrics_*) , but have few issues.
>  1) Duration execution it just time between start execution and return cursor 
> to client and doesn't include all life time of query.
>  2) It doesn't know about multistatement queries. Such queries participate in 
> statistics as single query without splitting.
>  3) API to access the statistics expose as depend on cache, however query 
> don't have such dependency.
>   
>  Need to create parallel similar realization as we already have.
>  Use new infrastructure of tracking running queries developed under 
> IGNITE-10621 and update statistics on unregister phase.
>  Expose API on upper level then it placed now. Right place will be written 
> later.
>   
>   



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to