[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ivan Rakov updated IGNITE-11465:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
We keep history of GridAffinityAssignmentCache#MAX_HIST_SIZE affinity 
assignments. However, flood of client joins/leaves may wipe it out entirely and 
cause fail/hang of transaction that was started before the flood due to the 
following exception:
{code:java}
            if (cache == null || cache.topologyVersion().compareTo(topVer) > 0) 
{
                throw new IllegalStateException("Getting affinity for topology 
version earlier than affinity is " +
                    "calculated [locNode=" + ctx.discovery().localNode() +
                    ", grp=" + cacheOrGrpName +
                    ", topVer=" + topVer +
                    ", head=" + head.get().topologyVersion() +
                    ", history=" + affCache.keySet() +
                    ']');
            }
{code}
History is limited in order to prevent JVM heap overflow. At the same time, 
only "server event" affinity assignments are heavy: "client event" assignments 
are just shallow copies of "server event" assignments.
I suggest to limit history by the number of "server event" assignments.
Also, considering the provided fix, I don't see any need to keep 500 items in 
history. I propose to change history size to 50.

  was:
We keep history of GridAffinityAssignmentCache#MAX_HIST_SIZE affinity 
assignments. However, flood of client joins/leaves may wipe it out entirely and 
cause fail/hang of transaction that was started before the flood due to the 
following exception:
{code:java}
            if (cache == null || cache.topologyVersion().compareTo(topVer) > 0) 
{
                throw new IllegalStateException("Getting affinity for topology 
version earlier than affinity is " +
                    "calculated [locNode=" + ctx.discovery().localNode() +
                    ", grp=" + cacheOrGrpName +
                    ", topVer=" + topVer +
                    ", head=" + head.get().topologyVersion() +
                    ", history=" + affCache.keySet() +
                    ']');
            }
{code}
History is limited in order to prevent JVM heap overflow. At the same time, 
only "server event" affinity assignments are heavy: "client event" assignments 
are just shallow copies of "server event" assignments.
I suggest to limit history by the number of "server event" assignments.
Also, considering the provided fix, I don't see any need to keep 500 items in 
history. I changed history size to 40.


> Multiple client leave/join events may wipe affinity assignment history and 
> cause transactions fail
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-11465
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11465
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ivan Rakov
>            Assignee: Ivan Rakov
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> We keep history of GridAffinityAssignmentCache#MAX_HIST_SIZE affinity 
> assignments. However, flood of client joins/leaves may wipe it out entirely 
> and cause fail/hang of transaction that was started before the flood due to 
> the following exception:
> {code:java}
>             if (cache == null || cache.topologyVersion().compareTo(topVer) > 
> 0) {
>                 throw new IllegalStateException("Getting affinity for 
> topology version earlier than affinity is " +
>                     "calculated [locNode=" + ctx.discovery().localNode() +
>                     ", grp=" + cacheOrGrpName +
>                     ", topVer=" + topVer +
>                     ", head=" + head.get().topologyVersion() +
>                     ", history=" + affCache.keySet() +
>                     ']');
>             }
> {code}
> History is limited in order to prevent JVM heap overflow. At the same time, 
> only "server event" affinity assignments are heavy: "client event" 
> assignments are just shallow copies of "server event" assignments.
> I suggest to limit history by the number of "server event" assignments.
> Also, considering the provided fix, I don't see any need to keep 500 items in 
> history. I propose to change history size to 50.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to