[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16790866#comment-16790866
 ] 

Roman Kondakov edited comment on IGNITE-11079 at 3/12/19 7:43 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

Problem: The problem was that [implemented 
optimization|https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/commit/42293fac88c29544b7c55c0340224afbf474a301]
 of storing filtered events in the backup queues was not taken into account for 
this test. After this optimization backups do not store all filtered events and 
instead storing they use {{filtered}} counter. In this case the expectation of 
the large size of backup queues is wrong.

Fix: fixed the expectation of backup queues total size - it should be small or 
even zero.

 Since the only test code was changed, the RunAll visa from the TC Bot is not 
necessary. I've runned two relevant suites (mvcc and non-mvcc). Waiting for 
results:

[https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=3299122&tab=queuedBuildOverviewTab]

[https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=3299120&tab=queuedBuildOverviewTab]


was (Author: rkondakov):
Problem: The problem was that [implemented 
optimization|https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/commit/42293fac88c29544b7c55c0340224afbf474a301]
 of storing filtered events in the backup queues was not taken into account for 
this test. After this optimization backups do not store all filtered events and 
instead storing they use {{filtered}} counter. In this case the expectation of 
the large size of backup queues is wrong.

Fix: fixed the expectation of backup queues total size - it should be small or 
even zero.

 Since the only test code was changed, the RunAll visa from the TC Bot is not 
necessary. I've runned two relevant suites (mvcc and non-mvcc). Waiting for 
results:

[https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3298494&tab=queuedBuildOverviewTab]

[https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3298496&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_ContinuousQuery3]

> MVCC: IgniteCacheContinuousQueryBackupQueueTest is flacky.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-11079
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11079
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mvcc
>            Reporter: Andrew Mashenkov
>            Assignee: Roman Kondakov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: MakeTeamcityGreenAgain
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> See Tc run
>  
> [https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&testNameId=925274886589214180&tab=testDetails]
> Test fails after series of long JVM pauses with stacktrace:
> {code:java}
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>  at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:55)
>  at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:22)
>  at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:31)
>  at 
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.query.continuous.IgniteCacheContinuousQueryBackupQueueTest.testManyQueryBackupQueue(IgniteCacheContinuousQueryBackupQueueTest.java:175)
>  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>  at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>  at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>  at 
> org.apache.ignite.testframework.junits.GridAbstractTest$6.run(GridAbstractTest.java:2088)
>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748){code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to