[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16806631#comment-16806631
 ] 

Ivan Pavlukhin commented on IGNITE-10078:
-----------------------------------------

[~ascherbakov], also I suggest to improve terminology a little bit. In my 
understanding a term _Gap_ is used both for a received counter intervals (e.g. 
committed tx) staying in a queue and for missing intervals which were not 
received yet. I suggest to use following terms which were assumed during 
introducing such concept for MVCC:
1. A _pending update_ for updates waiting an application in a queue.
2. A _gap_ for counter updates which were not received yet.

> Node failure during concurrent partition updates may cause partition desync 
> between primary and backup.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-10078
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10078
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Alexei Scherbakov
>            Assignee: Alexei Scherbakov
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> This is possible if some updates are not written to WAL before node failure. 
> They will be not applied by rebalancing due to same partition counters in 
> certain scenario:
> 1. Start grid with 3 nodes, 2 backups.
> 2. Preload some data to partition P.
> 3. Start two concurrent transactions writing single key to the same partition 
> P, keys are different
> {noformat}
> try(Transaction tx = client.transactions().txStart(PESSIMISTIC, 
> REPEATABLE_READ, 0, 1)) {
>       client.cache(DEFAULT_CACHE_NAME).put(k, v);
>       tx.commit();
> }
> {noformat}
> 4. Order updates on backup in the way such update with max partition counter 
> is written to WAL and update with lesser partition counter failed due to 
> triggering of FH before it's added to WAL
> 5. Return failed node to grid, observe no rebalancing due to same partition 
> counters.
> Possible solution: detect gaps in update counters on recovery and force 
> rebalance from a node without gaps if detected.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to