[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexey Zinoviev updated IGNITE-9432:
------------------------------------
Parent: IGNITE-9281
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
> Investigate ability to make ScanQuery faster
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-9432
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9432
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ml
> Affects Versions: 2.7
> Reporter: Anton Dmitriev
> Priority: Major
> Labels: newbie, newbie++
> Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> When we make ScanQuery via Binary Client Protocol it works very slowly in
> case we need to retrieve a big amount of objects (all objects in our case).
> The most slower part is a waiting for response from Apache Ignite. This also
> mentioned on devlist
> [http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/How-to-reduce-Scan-Query-execution-time-td34212.html].
> To reproduce the problem we've prepared a small example:
> [slow-scan-query-reproducer|https://github.com/dmitrievanthony/slow-scan-query-reproducer].
> In this example we creates a cache with 500 objects 1Mb each (on localhost),
> we make ScanQuery with different page sizes and calculate time between the
> moment when the request has been sent and the moment when the response is
> ready to be receive. The measurements are here:
> Page size 5 Mb, waiting time 119.85 ± 6.72 ms
> Page size 10 Mb, waiting time 157.70 ± 15.35 ms
> Page size 20 Mb, waiting time 204.50 ± 19.18 ms
> Page size 50 Mb, waiting time 264.70 ± 22.30 ms
> Page size 100 Mb, waiting time 463.35 ± 17.12 ms
> Page size 150 Mb, waiting time 672.50 ± 21.98 ms
> As result we spend ~4ms per every megabyte on _something_. It means that we
> will be able to achieve 250Mb/s throughput in best case. It's too slow, isn't
> it?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
