[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16984121#comment-16984121
 ] 

swy edited comment on IGNITE-12374 at 11/28/19 3:28 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------

[~zstan] please find ignite-logs-config-source-20191128.zip attached. It 
include,
1. source code of sample app
2. my-config.xml for ignite configuration
3. tdump
4. java visualvm snapshot
5. heapdump

hdump, threaddump and snapshot generated from window at 11:10am
ignite-ee834330.0.log generated from server at 22:10pm
so tdump, heapdump and snapshot is ahead 13 hours from ignite log.

Can you help also to run the same app in your environment? It would be easier 
to isolate environment and configuration issue. 

Thanks.


was (Author: yow):
[~zstan] please find ignite-logs-config-source-20191128.zip attached. It 
include,
1. source code of sample app
2. my-config.xml for ignite configuration
3. tdump
4. java visualvm snapshot
5. heapdump

hdump, threaddump and snapshot generated from window at 11:10am
ignite-ee834330.0.log generated from server at 22:10pm
so tdump, heapdump and snapshot is ahead 13 hours from ignite log.

> Too low performance ~200TPS for single ODBC client
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-12374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12374
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: clients, odbc
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.5
>         Environment: Ignite server run on top of Kubernetes, with 2 server 
> nodes, persistence enabled. Both CPU and RAM at server/client server is 
> sufficient according to system reports.
>            Reporter: swy
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: ignite-9bb53f34.0.log, 
> ignite-logs-config-source-20191128.zip, odbcsample.allchar.rebind.cc, 
> odbcsample.cc, profiling01.png, profiling03.png, profling02.png, 
> snapshot-1574845275597.nps, threaddump-1573207804944.tdump, 
> threaddump-1574845414243.tdump, values.yaml
>
>
> Hi, in our test ignite performance with ODBC connection is too bad to proceed 
> with product integration. It is about ~200 TPS, each transaction with 
> select+update operation.
> Please refer to attach sample program. It is just a simple test case. 
> Based on the profiling most of the time consumed by sql execution. Please 
> advice if the application did not do the right thing.
> Thank you.
> local ignite server, but the result same to remote container Ignite 
> deployment too.
> cat /etc/apache-ignite/my-config.xml
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
>        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>        xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
>         http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd";>
>     <bean id="ignite.cfg" 
> class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.IgniteConfiguration">
>         <property name="clientConnectorConfiguration">
>             <bean 
> class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.ClientConnectorConfiguration"/>
>         </property>
>         <property name="binaryConfiguration">
>             <bean class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.BinaryConfiguration">
>                 <property name="compactFooter" value="false"/>
>                 <property name="idMapper">
>                     <bean 
> class="org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryBasicIdMapper">
>                         <property name="lowerCase" value="true"/>
>                     </bean>
>                 </property>
>             </bean>
>         </property>
>     </bean>
> </beans>
> g++ -I/usr/include -I./ignite/binary/include -I./ignite/common/include 
> -I./ignite/common/os/linux/include -I./ignite/common/os/win/include 
> -I./ignite/core/include -I./ignite/jni/include odbcsample.cc -o odbcsample 
> -lodbc -L./ignite-libs/libignite.so -L./ignite-libs/libignite-odbc.so



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to