[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Maxim Muzafarov updated IGNITE-8856:
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.8)

> Incorrect behavior of BinaryTypeConfiguration in case of using a wildcard for 
> type names
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-8856
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8856
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: general
>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>            Reporter: Vyacheslav Koptilin
>            Assignee: Vyacheslav Koptilin
>            Priority: Major
>
> Let's consider the following BinaryConfiguration:
> {code:java}
>         <property name="binaryConfiguration">
>             <bean class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.BinaryConfiguration">
>                 ...
>                 <property name="typeConfigurations">
>                     <list>
>                         <bean 
> class="org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryTypeConfiguration">
>                             <property name="typeName" 
> value="org.apache.ignite.examples.*"/>
>                             <property name="nameMapper">
>                                 <bean 
> class="org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryBasicNameMapper">
>                                     <constructor-arg type="boolean" 
> value="false"/>
>                                 </bean>
>                             </property>
>                         </bean>
>                     </list>
>                 </property>
>             </bean>
>         </property>
> {code}
> My intention is using custom BinaryBasicMapper for all classes in the 
> specified package and its sub packages,
> but BinaryContext implementation matches only classes that reside in the 
> "org.apache.ignite.examples" package.
> Classes from sub-packages are not matched, and therefore do not use the 
> specified BinaryBasicNameMapper.
> *UPD:*
> Well, it seems that the current behavior is not an error and was implemented 
> in this way intentionally.
> On the other hand, I think it would be good to have the ability to specify 
> sub-packages as well.
> For example, it can be achieved through the '**' pattern as follows:
> ||example||defenition||priority||
> |org.apache.ignite.examples.TestClass|matches exactly the one class|the 
> highest priority|
> |org.apache.ignite.examples.*|matches all classes in the given package|medium|
> |org.apache.ignite.examples.**|matches all classes in the given package and 
> its sub-packages|low|
> The proposed enhancement does not break the current behavior and allows to 
> specify a filter for sub-packages.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to