[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16989701#comment-16989701
 ] 

Stanilovsky Evgeny commented on IGNITE-12374:
---------------------------------------------

[~yow] look, you can got some speed boost if :
1. replicated cache appropriate for your case :WITH 
\"template=REPLICATED,CACHE_NAME=cdrtest_cacheR,WRITE_SYNCHRONIZATION_MODE=PRIMARY_SYNC\"
2. call run.sh with default 50 2000 witch clear persistent base can give flaky 
results cause some time need for inner structures initialization, partitions 
etc, run first warmup run and second one will give you clear results.
3. can you change your key for example for Long ? 
4. looks like 10k per one thread is impossible now.
looks like that`s all i can give you.

> Too low performance ~200TPS for single ODBC client
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-12374
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12374
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: clients, odbc
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.5
>         Environment: Ignite server run on top of Kubernetes, with 2 server 
> nodes, persistence enabled. Both CPU and RAM at server/client server is 
> sufficient according to system reports.
>            Reporter: swy
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: ignite-9bb53f34.0.log, 
> ignite-logs-config-source-20191128.zip, 
> ignite-logs-config-source-20191129.zip, my-config-zstan.xml, odbcsample, 
> odbcsample.allchar.rebind.cc, odbcsample.cc, profiling01.png, 
> profiling03.png, profling02.png, screenshot-1.png, 
> snapshot-1574845275597.nps, threaddump-1573207804944.tdump, 
> threaddump-1574845414243.tdump, values.yaml
>
>
> Hi, in our test ignite performance with ODBC connection is too bad to proceed 
> with product integration. It is about ~200 TPS, each transaction with 
> select+update operation.
> Please refer to attach sample program. It is just a simple test case. 
> Based on the profiling most of the time consumed by sql execution. Please 
> advice if the application did not do the right thing.
> Thank you.
> local ignite server, but the result same to remote container Ignite 
> deployment too.
> {{cat /etc/apache-ignite/my-config.xml}}
> {noformat}
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
>        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>        xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
>         http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd";>
>     <bean id="ignite.cfg" 
> class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.IgniteConfiguration">
>         <property name="clientConnectorConfiguration">
>             <bean 
> class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.ClientConnectorConfiguration"/>
>         </property>
>         <property name="binaryConfiguration">
>             <bean class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.BinaryConfiguration">
>                 <property name="compactFooter" value="false"/>
>                 <property name="idMapper">
>                     <bean 
> class="org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryBasicIdMapper">
>                         <property name="lowerCase" value="true"/>
>                     </bean>
>                 </property>
>             </bean>
>         </property>
>     </bean>
> </beans>
> {noformat}
> {{g++ -I/usr/include -I./ignite/binary/include -I./ignite/common/include 
> -I./ignite/common/os/linux/include -I./ignite/common/os/win/include 
> -I./ignite/core/include -I./ignite/jni/include odbcsample.cc -o odbcsample 
> -lodbc -L./ignite-libs/libignite.so -L./ignite-libs/libignite-odbc.so}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to