[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17017461#comment-17017461
]
Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-6804:
---------------------------------------
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/6976/head] Base: [master] : Possible Blockers
(49)|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}
{color:#d04437}Start Nodes{color} [[tests
1|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4936485]]
* IgniteStartStopRestartTestSuite:
IgniteProjectionStartStopRestartSelfTest.testCustomScript - Test has low fail
rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
{color:#d04437}Queries 1{color} [[tests
42|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4936546]]
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCachePartitionedTransactionalSnapshotColumnConstraintTest.testPutLongStringKeyField
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCachePartitionedTransactionalSnapshotColumnConstraintTest.testPutValidDecimalKeyAndValueField
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCachePartitionedTransactionalSnapshotColumnConstraintTest.testPutLongStringValueField
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCacheReplicatedTransactionalSnapshotColumnConstraintTest.testPutValidDecimalKeyAndValueField
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCacheReplicatedTransactionalSnapshotColumnConstraintTest.testPutLongStringKeyField
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCacheReplicatedTransactionalSnapshotColumnConstraintTest.testPutLongStringValueField
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCachePartitionedAtomicColumnConstraintsTest.testPutValidDecimalKeyAndValueField
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCachePartitionedAtomicColumnConstraintsTest.testPutTooLongStringKeyFieldFail
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCachePartitionedAtomicColumnConstraintsTest.testPutLongStringKeyField -
Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCachePartitionedAtomicColumnConstraintsTest.testPutTooLongStringValueFieldFail
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite:
IgniteCachePartitionedAtomicColumnConstraintsTest.testPutTooLongDecimalValueFieldScaleFail
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
... and 31 tests blockers
{color:#d04437}Data Structures{color} [[tests
4|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4936531]]
* IgniteCacheDataStructuresSelfTestSuite:
SingleBackupImplicitTransactionalReadRepairTest.test[getEntry=false,
async=false] - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteCacheDataStructuresSelfTestSuite:
SingleBackupImplicitTransactionalReadRepairTest.test[getEntry=false,
async=true] - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteCacheDataStructuresSelfTestSuite:
SingleBackupImplicitTransactionalReadRepairTest.test[getEntry=true,
async=false] - Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
* IgniteCacheDataStructuresSelfTestSuite:
SingleBackupImplicitTransactionalReadRepairTest.test[getEntry=true, async=true]
- Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
{color:#d04437}Cache 9{color} [[tests
1|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4936527]]
* IgniteCacheTestSuite9:
TxPartitionCounterStateOnePrimaryTwoBackupsTest.testPartialPrepare_3TX_6_1 -
Test has low fail rate in base branch 0,0% and is not flaky
{color:#d04437}MVCC Cache 5{color} [[tests
1|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4936558]]
* IgniteCacheMvccTestSuite5:
GridCacheHashMapPutAllWarningsTest.testHashMapPutAllExplicitOptimistic -
History for base branch is absent.
{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All*
Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4936570&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]
> Print a warning if HashMap is passed into bulk update operations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-6804
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6804
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: cache
> Reporter: Denis A. Magda
> Assignee: Ilya Kasnacheev
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: usability
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Ignite newcomers tend to stumble on deadlocks simply because the keys are
> passed in an unordered HashMap. Propose to do the following:
> * update bulk operations Java docs.
> * print out a warning if not SortedMap (e.g. HashMap,
> Weak/Identity/Concurrent/Linked HashMap etc) is passed into
> a bulk method (instead of SortedMap) and contains more than 1 element.
> However, we should make sure that we only print that warning once and not
> every time the API is called.
> * do not produce warning for explicit optimistic transactions
> More details are here:
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Re-Ignite-2-0-0-GridUnsafe-unmonitor-td23706.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
